Monday, 20 May 2019

Personality and Characteristic of the Little Horn Referred to The Anti-Christ

Print Friendly and PDF

"The Promised One of All Ages”  
"The Coming Of The Lawless One” 

andre@simplicityinthegospel.com

Napoleon Bonaparte's characteristics and personality represent the character and personality of the Antichrist within the first 3 1/2 years of the 7 weeks of Judah's trouble where he will confirm a covenant between Israel and surrounding Arab nations for seven years' As for Hitler's characteristic and personality represent the person of the Antichrist within the last 3 1/2 years of Judah's trouble starting at the moment he desecrates the temple.

“And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate,” Daniel 9:27 KJV
“And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days,” Daniel 12:11 KJV
 [ The Great Tribulation ] “Therefore when you see the ‘abomination of desolation,’ spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place” (whoever reads, let him understand),” Matthew 24:15 NKJV

“Whoever reads, let him understand” Why would Jesus add this comment?  Because He wants the reader to see it coming and to warn everybody specifically the Jews living in Jerusalem at the time of the fulfillment of this prophesy to run for their lives.


The character traits of the Antichrist that will deceive the whole world are not new in the history of humankind. Two well-known individuals come to mind, Bonaparte and Hitler. Both have similarities in historical background, such as political leadership and accomplishment.   The characteristic of both combined leaders might reveal the character of the “abomination of desolation to come, spoken of by Daniel the prophet before he stands in the holy place.”  It will astonish you.

Similarities between Bonaparte and Hitler, they both:

·        Came from the middle class - no monarchy bloodline
·        Enlisted young in the military
·        Rebuilt a nation in chaos and prospered
·        Subdued internal revolts
·        Abolished the established government, and created new institutions that favoured their aspiration to reign over all of Europe
·        Name themselves Emperor (Chancellor) as Caesar - god-like above the population, Supreme Commander
·        Signed an agreement with a pope, a concordat
·        Warred against Britain and Russia and lost
·        Became arrogant and self-confident refusing consultations from their generals

“The Vatican's secretary of state, Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli (the future Pope Pius XII), and Germany's vice chancellor, Franz von Papen, formally signed a concordat between the Holy See and the German Reich on July 20, 1933. This event ended negotiations that began after Adolf Hitler became Germany's chancellor on Jan. 30, 1933. Among the witnesses to this event were Msgr. Giovanni Battista Montini (the future Pope Paul VI) and Msgr. Ludwig Kaas, the leader of Germany's Catholic Center Party. Neither Pope Pius XI nor Hitler attended the meeting; both had already approved of the concordat. The pope ratified the agreement two months later on Sept. 10. The Concordat of 1933 specified the church's rights in the Third Reich.”  http://isurvived.org/4Debates/vaticans_concordat-HITLER.html

In 1801 Bonaparte signed an agreement with the pope, the Concordat making Catholicism the dominant but not exclusive religion of France. He had no personal use for religion but understood its political value.
"If I govern a nation of Jews," he said, "I shall restore the temple of Salomon." Religion is excellent stuff to keep common people quiet.
Bonaparte rules with a carrot and a stick. He had no patience with those who demanded liberty. He rules with an iron hand, crushing anyone who dares speak out against him, making a sham parliament and bogus free elections.
"I have been nourish by reflecting on liberty," said Bonaparte, "but I thrust aside when it obstructed my path."
All he lacks is a crown. He wished to be a king, king of an empire, therefore he made himself Emperor by a Senate proclamation, a Senate that he established a mirror of the Roman senate, no power but give the impression to the common people that they have a say in the politic of France.

Sanctify by the pope that he brought in to participate to make everything a sacred heir. He slowly laid His own crown on his head. He made himself appointed by God; therefore have authority over all man. "He looks like a Caesar on a golden coin," one observed. He dominated France, and now he looks for the conquest of Europe. He made himself the modern Caesar of his time.

"I am the instrument of Providence," Napoleons said, "she will use me as long that I accomplish her design, then she will break me like a glass."

It is my belief that both Bonaparte and Hitler were men influenced by a spiritual entity. Bonaparte's god was providence. She was the Goddess of Destiny Seyella or Necessitas, goddess of destiny, the Roman equivalent of Ananke. In Greek mythology, the god is better known as the Moirai, which watches over the fate assigned to every being by eternal laws so that it might take its course without obstruction. Bonaparte was an intellectual and a philosopher. He practiced what he preached. He did not believe in religious institutions but used them. He was an advocate of freedom of religion to appease the mass population. Napoleon emancipated Jews, as well as Protestants in Catholic countries and Catholics in Protestant countries, from laws, which restricted them to live in ghettos, and he expanded their rights to property, worship, and careers. He did not despise the Jews as Hitler did. He was his own god. He loved France and his son, therefore he chose to abdicate rather than fight to the last resources. Suicidal, he never was.

As for Adolph Hitler


Hitler had a secret dark side. He became a member of the Thule Society; sun worship, which is better known as Satan worship, which is enough to change somebody's personality, even to the point of hating Jews who are God's Chosen People. Satan is real and the Jews are still God's chosen people with a destiny, which is to prove to the whole world that God is God of all nations and Jesus will rule among His people and over all nations. Satan attempted to derail God's plan by trying to exterminate all Jews. Now you know what prophecy is all about. It is about God's will to be fulfilled despite all Satan's obstruction. Hitler brought his country to total destruction and committed suicide.

As Daniel was explaining a dream to the king Nebuchadnezzar, he mentioned:
"As you saw iron mixed with ceramic clay, they will mingle with the seed of men; but they will not adhere to one another, just as iron does not mix with clay," Daniel 2:43.
There are two accepted interpretations by students of prophecy. One is that the kingdoms will not be united as one people, a fragile political agreement among nations, and the second interpretation is that all men in a position of leadership will be influenced by spiritual hosts such as demons. Satan will possess the man that will play the role of the Anti-Christ.

Now, by using these character traits of both Bonaparte and Hitler, you might be able to observe who in the political arena has those characteristics to fulfill the role of the Little Horn in the coming prophetic event of One World in Dis-order, the ten toes. Yet that would be futile since the Bible explicitly explained that the man of sin will not be revealed until the Church is removed through an event called the rapture, (1 Thess 4:16-17, 2 Thess 2:6-7)

This article is an excerpt from a commentary titled, “The United States Of America and Russia In Bible Prophecy.”  by Andre Delage


Wednesday, 24 April 2019

Potentate, the King of kings and Lord of lords

Print Friendly and PDF
Fight the good fight of faith... for the sake of the kingdom of God

andre@simplicityinthegospel.com


The Church is inasmuch in a sad spiritual state nowadays as Jacob's descendent Israel was in Egypt.  Once freed from slavery and from the influence of the Egyptian gods and principalities, in the wilderness God taught them the way and the truth preparing them for their inheritance in the promised land.

God’s plan is to deliver us the Church from slavery, (1 Thess 4:16-17). Believe it or not, this present world is Egypt (spiritual Babylon) worldwide. There is an event called the rapture, where Jesus will come and take us out of Egypt but this time the Church will not be taken into the wilderness. Time spent in the wilderness was Israel's consequence for their disobedience for refusing to enter the promised land.


The Church will be taken to heaven and will be taught for seven years the truth of God’s stewardship preparing us to reign with Jesus at the end of the 7 years of tribulation on earth.  When Israel was in Egypt, the wrath of God came before their deliverance, as for the Church, the wrath of God is manifest worldwide - (Egypt) after our deliverance.

At the judgement seat following the rapture, each Christian will give an account of their stewardship on earth. That will determine which position of governance they will receive (crown) for the Kingdom of God. The truth will also be revealed about the principalities of governing as kings in God's kingdom. Since God instructed Moses on His precepts and principalities for His people Israel before entering the promised land so will Jesus instruct the Church before entering His kingdom on earth. Now you know why all Christians are admonished to fight the good fight of faith... 

“But you, O man of God, flee these things and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, gentleness. Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, to which you were also called and have confessed the good confession in the presence of many witnesses. I urge you in the sight of God who gives life to all things, and before Christ Jesus who witnessed the good confession before Pontius Pilate, that you keep this commandment without spot, blameless until our Lord Jesus Christ’s appearing, which He will manifest in His own time, He who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings and Lord of lords, who alone has immortality, dwelling in unapproachable light, whom no man has seen or can see, to whom be honor and everlasting power. Amen,”    1 Tim 6:11-16

andre@simplicityinthegospel.com


Tuesday, 12 February 2019

CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS VS THE CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

Print Friendly and PDF


VS.


andre@simplicityinthegospel.com


"For you, brethren, have been called to liberty; only do not use liberty as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another." Galatians 5:13

“And this occurred because of false brethren secretly brought in (who came in by stealth to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage)," Galatians 2:4


On June 21, 2014, I read a commentary written by Mr. Rex Murphy in The National Post titled, In Justin Trudeau’s World, Christians not apply,” subtitled, “Is there room in public life for truly religious Canadians? Not when it comes to the federal Liberals.”

Mr. Rex Murphy brought a very serious point of view, which surprisingly came from a mainstream media commentator.   He made an astounding remark:

“As things now are, a truly religious person must actually stay out of politics — must forgo an active role in democratic government — because, in our brazen and new age, he or she will be faced with irreconcilable moral choices. If elected, he or she will be required to betray their faith and themselves, and on those very issues that matter most: issues of life, family, autonomy and the dignity of persons.”

 Mr. Rex Murphy got me thinking. I did my research and consequently, I wrote a book. In my research, I observed that through the years, there has been a subtle shift in vocabulary within The Charter of Rights and Freedoms by our government, which started in the Hon. Pierre Trudeau era. Few have recognized it, yet it had a drastic effect on our society and even within the churches. It interferes with and weakens our perception of how we can defend our constitutional rights.  It is not the first time the government has used the tactic of redefining the word to accommodate its objective[1].

I would like to point out a report written in 1984 by the NHLRA (Newfoundland-Labrador Human Rights Association). Please take a look at the anomaly within the report.

In 1984, the Newfoundland-Labrador Human Rights Association (NHLRA) sent a brief to the Minister of Justice criticizing the school system, stating that, “The greatest single threat to equality of religion and freedom of worship (in the province) is the restrictive nature of the denominational educational system. It is recommended that a second alternative be available for students who are not of faith which benefit from special constitutional privilege, or that denominational schools be prohibited from discriminating on the basis of religion.”

Have you noticed the sudden shift in vocabulary? These subtle shifts in the interpretation of terminology interfere with and weaken our perception of how the Charter of Rights and Freedoms can defend us.

The federal and provincial governments established the Human Rights Commission to apply justice and equality under the guise of humanism, not according to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This was a ruse to sneak into our school's religious beliefs, moral values, and ethical behaviours, which went against Christian fundamental rights.

The 1984 NHLRA report was in direct conflict with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which was written two years after it was signed into law by Queen Elizabeth II of Canada on April 17, 1982, along with the rest of the Act. The Charter was preceded by the Canadian Bill of Rights, which was enacted in 1960.

The NHLRA went beyond its mandate by discarding the Charter of Rights and Freedoms under the principle that every person is equal in dignity and rights, disregarding religious rights not only toward Christians but also all religions. This report was a direct attack on the Judeo-Christian culture in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador.

The NHLRA report systematically shifts the Charter of Rights and Freedoms vocabulary as such:

  • ·        twisted freedom of religion - to equality of religion
  • ·        twisted freedom of peaceful assembly - to freedom of worship
  • ·        twisted freedom of religion - to the special constitutional privilege
  • ·        twisted Rights Respecting Certain Schools Preserved - due to the restrictive nature of the denominational educational system
  • ·        twisted fundamental freedoms guaranteed by or under the Constitution of Canada in respect of denominational, separate or dissentient schools - to the restrictive nature of the denominational educational system and to discriminate based on religion, which was saying “based on.”


The clergy are also in error in using these false, twisted terminologies. At the opening and closing prayers, I heard pastors thanking to God for the freedom to worship, unaware that God has given them much more than the simple right to worship in Canada. I believe God wrote the Constitution on His behalf, for His purpose, not ours. He gave us, not the government, the freedom of religion. The Constitution was founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law. Not any gods, but the Christian God – the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The God who so loved the world gave His only begotten Son (Jesus), that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life,   John 3:16. (CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 PART I).  The Constitution of Canada was signed by Queen Elizabeth, who holds the title of the 'Defender of the Faith and Supreme Governor of the Church of England’. 

What is the difference between freedom of worship and freedom of religion?  The difference is that freedom of worship restricts Christians' sphere of influence by living according to their beliefs, ethics and moral standard values within the walls of a building, while the freedom of religion gives Christians the freedom to carry their right to beliefs, ethics and moral standard values everywhere in our society.   It is our civil rights. Have you not noticed how often we hear from the secular to keep our religion at church?  It is a constant attack on our rights. Event Christians among themselves demanded not to mix religion with politics… go figure. We have the fundamental right to peaceful assembly in a church environment and freedom of religion in a social environment, in particular in our school. The NHLRA violated the rights of the Christian Faith religion in Newfoundland and Labrador under the guise of humanism, and that went on to every region in Canada.

Since the Charter of Rights and Freedoms was a significant obstacle to a certain liberal left globalist government elite, a scam, a scheme was created to weaken Christians' influence. Yes, Christians were God’s light on the lampstand and the salt of the earth, who had the mandate to protect Canada from an autocratic political party or candidate.

The elite, the so-called public influential and not-so-secret society made plans to silence the churches. They did it through the CRA – Tax Exemption. The churches accepted a pact with the devil. The churches agreed in exchange for Tax exemption to waive their right to participate in any partisan political activity involving direct or indirect support of or opposition to any political party or candidate for public office. Under the devil’s pact, a church’s denomination can not single out the voting pattern on an issue of anyone elected representative or political party? 


"Under the revised measures, which received Royal Assent on December 13, 2018, charities are still required to have exclusively charitable purposes and are still prohibited from undertaking activities that support or oppose a political party or candidate for public office."  Canada Revenue Agency

What does Jesus have to say about this pact?

“No servant can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon,” Luke 16:13

“Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s,” Matthew 22:21

Since the shepherds were taken out of the way, the following agenda was to pave the way to weaken the Charter of Rights and Freedoms before it became law in 1982. Before the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Federal government under the Liberal leadership of Hon. Pierre Trudeau established the 1977 Charter of Rights and Freedoms under a new institution, the Human Rights Commission. You would probably believe that the Human Rights Commission wound side with Judeo-Christian values, but on the contrary, it sided with humanism philosophies founded by human ethical belief that we are all equal to our belief without God of the Bible in the picture, it will be utilized as the tools of reason, base on science and human logic when approaching problem-solving and constitutional decision making.

What were the consequences? Christians were now vulnerable since the government, through the Human Rights Commission, was making up the rules on our behalf without shepherds to defend them. Ultimately, Christian parents lost their parental sovereignty to the government, which teaches religious values and sexual behaviours that go against Christians' moral code.

“True and pure diversity in a multicultural society is to allow each parent to teach their children their religious belief, their values according to their culture and tradition, and to teach their sexual, moral standards and behaviour without prejudice and without interference from any level of government. Isn't that what the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is about?”

As I mentioned above, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms was written in a simple language for Canadians to understand[2]. Therefore, the federal government turned and twisted the simplicity of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms into a complex and confusing vocabulary to persuade the average Canadian to let THEM - the government take charge of defining every aspect of the constitution, making it powerless for all Canadians.  That is where and how the Canadian Christians lost their influence. Christians cease shining their light on the lampstand.

According to the liberal left elite[3]

“-the Charter is a very broad document, which provides Canadians with a wide range of rights, including basic freedoms, democratic rights, legal rights, language rights and equality rights. The Canadian Human Rights Act, by contrast, is a much narrower document, and only deals with equality rights; in particular, the right not to be discriminated against”

How does God view their arrogance in redefining HIS anointed LAW?


“It is time for You to act, O Lord, 
for they have regarded Your law as void,” 

Psalm 119:126


The Charter is entrenched by LAW in the Constitution of Canada and, therefore, unmovable. The Canadian Human Rights Act is simply a piece of federal legislation that may be repealed or revised by a simple majority vote in the federal House of Commons. In simple language, the federal government installed a window blind in front of the Constitution so that average Canadians, particularly Christians, wouldn’t have access to the light (the truth).

From then on, it didn’t get any better. In 1996, for example, the Act was amended through the Human Rights Commission to include sexual orientation as an enumerated ground of discrimination. As such, the Act now prohibits discrimination on the grounds of a person’s sexuality. The sad result is that Christian parents, and all other parents of different religions, cultures, traditions and moral values, are powerless from the constant attack from the school boards all over Canada, supported by the Canadian Human Rights Act, to teach sexual behaviours that go against parents’ consent. The government owns our children – the United Nations owns children through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), as viewed on page ninety-nine of the NL Religious Education 1 - curriculum guide 2016[4].

An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code was passed in 2017 by the Parliament of Canada. It was introduced as Bill C-16 of the first session of the 42nd Parliament. The law adds gender expression and gender identity as protected grounds to the Canadian Human Rights Act and also to the Criminal Code provisions dealing with hate propaganda, incitement to genocide, and aggravating factors in sentencing.  The bill adds "gender identity or expression" to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination in the Canadian Human Rights Act and the list of characteristics of identifiable groups protected from hate propaganda in the Criminal Code. It also adds that evidence that an offence was motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on a person's gender identity or expression constitutes an aggravating circumstance for a court to consider when imposing a criminal sentence. (Source).

We individual Christians are responsible for being inactive. We can’t put all the blame on our pastors, although they will give an account to God for leading His sheep astray.

Nowhere in the Constitution Act, 1982(1) SCHEDULE B, CONSTITUTION ACT, does the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms recognize the Canadian Human Rights Act. The Canadian Human Rights Act is mentioned nowhere in theSchedule to the Constitution Act, 1982, Modernization of the Constitution’[5]. Therefore, since the Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law legislated thereafter by the Canadian Human Rights Act is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution Act, it is to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.




A Canadian Christian parent has not only lost their parental sovereignty to an autocratic government but also their national sovereignty to the United Nations. May God have mercy on us. All political parties are involved in the scheme. Therefore, the 2019 federal election won’t make a difference. And we can’t count on Section 59 of the Constitution, which allows the Queen to annul the law. At the 1930 Imperial Conference, it was agreed that the United Kingdom would not reserve or disallow legislation without the approval of the Canadian cabinet.


The Danger of the Liberal Autocratic Government

The Prime Minister of Canada has the supreme authority to govern the country of Canada. He can legislate any unlimited law without interference or obstruction from any opposition.  The Prime Minister of Canada is more powerful than the President of the United States of America.  The President of the United States of America must legislate any new law, requiring the approval of the House of Representatives and the Senate. Without the House of Representatives and the Senate’s approval, the President is idle, dead in the water.

As long as the Prime Minister of Canada has the majority in the House of Commons and his Party Members of Parliament give their full support, the Prime Minister of Canada reigns supreme. There is no stopping him, not even the Senate, as long as the partisan senators are in the majority. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was the only obstacle that could have gotten in the way. Yet, through time and multiple deceptions, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms has become a weak, archaic document,  unreachable to the average Canadian. A Charter made simple to read and understand has become complicated, complex, and elusive by being manipulated by a particular group of elites.


Therefore, to answer Mr. Rex Murphy's question, 
“Is there room in public life for truly religious Canadians?”  According to my research, the answer is yes.

IT IS OUR RIGHT

I am a family man with Christian beliefs that are viewed from outside the traditional Christian box. I am not a scholar, nor a theologian. Does this make any sense to you, readers? You are Christians. Too many Christians have given up - too many Christian parents are being challenged and persecuted by school boards across Canada and by all provincial governments. Too many Christians have been left astray by their own pastors, Christian community and are found to fight alone without the financial resources to challenge their rights to the Supreme Court of Canada, since they must first appeal to an unconstitutional Provincial and Federal Human Rights Commission.


Am I the only one who can see the deception?


I am not here to make a name for myself. I am writing to you just because I want to do what is right, since I see no one in Canada from a Christian point of view who sees what happened in the past fifty years. Am I too presumptuous?

I recently published a book titled “Canadian Christian Ministry 2018, The Most Lukewarm Church in the Whole Western Nations.”  This book is meant to raise awareness among churches and Christians that “WE” are responsible for letting the government teach our children values and religious beliefs that go against our faith.

I invite you to view the video clip https://youtu.be/xAVjopJ52AU

ISBN 978-1-64258-883-5

My blog - https://www.simplicityinthegospel.com/


References

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/rex-murphy-in-justin-trudeaus-world-christians-need-not-apply

https://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/ca_1982.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Canada#Constitution_Act,_1867

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Canada#Constitution_Act,_1867

https://www.mapleleafweb.com/features/canadian-human-rights-act-introduction-canada-s-federal-human-rights-legislation.html

https://www.simplicityinthegospel.com/2018/11/freedom-of-religion-vs-freedom-to.html

https://www.mapleleafweb.com/features/canadian-human-rights-act-introduction-canada-s-federal-human-rights-legislation.html

https://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/ca_1982.html

Constitutional Law of Canada, P W Hogg, (Student Edition, 2008), p. 52 (3.1) (Note 5).


[1] http://www.floppingaces.net/2011/09/03/liberals-redefine-words-reader-post/
[2] https://www.mapleleafweb.com/features/canadian-human-rights-act-introduction-canada-s-federal-human-rights-legislation.html   Web site removed
[3] https://www.mapleleafweb.com/features/canadian-human-rights-act-introduction-canada-s-federal-human-rights-legislation.html   Web site removed
[4] https://www.gov.nl.ca/education/files/k12_curriculum_guides_religion_2016_g1_re.pdf
[5] https://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/ca_1982.html






Canadian Christian Ministry 2018 - The Most Lukewarm Church in the Whole Western Nations 

by Andre Delage 

Free on Scribd